Afghan Triangle: Opium, Oil and Taliban
By A Khokar • Aug 2nd, 2009
On July 4, 2009 – authorities in New York made heroin bust with a street value of US$33 million and arrested 12 people, who were using Build-A-Bear dolls packed with drug as their distribution network. They also seized US$150,000 in cash – Daily News , July 5, 2009. Source of heroin was Afghanistan.
After humiliating the Red Army in Afghanistan and making Uncle Sam the sole world power – The Mujahideen Islamist leaders fell from the favour of America and its proxy governments in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan – in the fear that they might establish an Iran-friendly Islamic regime in Kabul. Therefore, a new group based on Saudi-version of Islamic state was given birth by CIA, ISI and Riyadh, which with the active help from Pakistan Air Force – forced two prominent Mujahideed leaders, Afghan President Rabbani and Afghan Prime Minister Gulbedin, to seek refuge in Iran in 1996. These two leaders were treated like foreign dignatories till the Taliban were ousted from power by their former midwife, the US.
The 9/11 was used as an excuse to make devil out of Taliban and their guest Osama Bin Laden. Both were blamed for 9/11 – though Taliban in their six-year-rule, did not had a single commercial or military plane or modern telecommunication network – but they were able to pull-out the greatest terror attack on American soil.
And how evil Taliban were – a Zionist Jew writer, Eben Kaplan, wrote in the journal of the most powerful Zionist think tank, 'Council on Foreign Relations' (it's reported that 400 of its members including its Jew president Richard Haass, Hilary Clinton and Dennis Ross are part of Obama's administration) under the title The Taliban in Afghanistan, on July 2, 2008:
"Public reaction to Taliban's rule was not wholly negative. While the rigid social standards (Wahhabism) fostered resentment, the Taliban cracked down on corruption that had run rampant through the government for years. The new leaders also brought stability to Afghanistan, greatly reducing the infighting between warlords that had devastated the civilian population. Seven year after their ouster, the Taliban continue to provide a semblance of stability in regions where coalition and government officials have been unable to restore order and provide basic services……"
Richard Haass, president CFR, who is also a senior adviser to Obama on foreign policy – has never criticized Zionist-regime's "thugocracy" against all its Arab neighbours – has in his June 26 interview with Bernard Gwertzman said: "The Iranian theocracy has become a "thugocracy" (having defeated the "Zion Revolution" in the aftermath of Ahmadinejad's huge victory) – but the Iranian regime will likely prevail because of its use of force against the population. This makes the urgency of negotiating an end to country's nuclear program more pronounced, and possibly more difficult. Iranian challenge (to Israel) still exists, and may actually be somewhat worse….."
So the question comes to mind is: why occupy Afghanistan when the leaders of both Afghan Mujahideen and Taliban were pro-America? The answer lies in the planning of the pro-Israel high-ranking officials in Clinton and Bush administrations – long before September 11, 2001 tragedy. The planned occupation of Afghanistan was based on two factors of greed - the Caspian Sea oil reserves and Taliban's ban on Poppy cultivation - the source of US$600 billion opium business in 2007 (second to oil and arms trade).
Taliban, on several occasions, offered to turn over Osama Bin Laden to a third country for trail, once Washington and Jewish media blamed him for masterminding the 9/11 – However, both Clinton and Bush administrations rejected those offers.
American puppet regimes were nededed both in Afghanistan and Pakistan to built the cheapest oil pipeline from Caspian Sea to Gwader port in Balochistan via Afghanistan.Furthermore, both these countries are itself rich in oil/gas and other natural resources: "Massive untapped gas reserves are believed to be lying beneath Pakistan's remotest deserts, but they're being held hostage by armed tribal groups demanding a better deal from the central government," – AFP, September 1, 2001.
Taliban's eradication program led to a 94% decline in opium cultivation by 2000. According to UN's 2001 figures, opium cultivation had fallen to 185 tons. Immediately, following US occupation in December 2001 – production increased dramatically, regaining its historical levels – 6,100 tons in 2006 (a 3200% increase in five years).
And who are the greatest beneficiaries of opium cultivated in Afghanistan, India and the rest of Far East countries – David Sassoon (1792-1864) and his family of course. Historically, Rothschild-controlled Britain won Hong Kong by launching the Opium Wars to give the Sassoons exclusive rights to drug an entire nation! According to the 1944 Jewish Encyclopedia: "He (David Sassoon) employed only Jews in his business, and wherever he sent them he built Synagouges and schools for them. He imported whole family of fellow Jews…and put them to work."
Arnold Rothstein was known as the American Drug Kingpin.
In order to keep a steady and secure flow of oil and opium – a powerful army is needed – and that's where the Arms Industry and NATO fits in. And let us not forget the "intelligence mafia" which keep the terrorism hoax alive – such as CIA, MI6, RAW, SVR, and MOSSAD.
Source: Rehmat World
Comments